Reading science fiction stories enables individuals with poor grip in English to improve their grammar skills. Speaking and writing in broken English is the result of not knowing how the structure of the English sentence work. Through routine reading, you will learn the correct way to write a proper English sentence. There are sci-fi tales at different reading problem levels. You can start from the one with easy reading difficulty level that has shorter length and then slowly advance to reading stories together with harder reading difficulty that have more length.
As you browse the science fiction story, you will encounter words you don’t understand. Each time you come across a challenging word, you should look up the dictionary and discover out its meaning. If you didn’t purchase a dictionary, then you can use the online dictionary to look up the meaning of the word. You can learn how to pronounce the new word correctly by playing the sound for the pronunciation in the online dictionary. The more science fiction stories you see, the broader your vocabulary will become.
Well, that depends on the kind of story you’re writing. The period of your narrative will dictate the amount of character information you’ll need to make them come to life. For simplicity sake, I have broken my personality sheet to what I use for each kind of writing. Your character sheets might vary.
Fiction by its very definition is unreal. After we see a novel we know that the narrative and the characters in it are only a product of creativity of the author. When we view a film we are aware that the characters are only acting their parts essentially pretending to be someone other than themselves. Still we are emotionally affected by the twists and turns in the story. We laugh, weep with them, and also sense indignant towards the bad men. The lovable hero or heroine might be despicable in actual life and the protagonist might be a perfect gentleman, but we identify them with all the characters they are portraying. In essence for this brief period we get hauled into the imaginary world of the author. Strangely enough this happens too with the author at least to some of these. He or she travels through the same emotions while composing and perhaps later also. Has what you have discovered added to your prior knowledge? No question, we are just getting going with all that can be acknowledged about check this. You can find there is much in common with topical areas closely resembling this one. Continue reading and you will see what we mean about crucial nuances you need to know about. If you are unsure about what is needed for you, then just take a better look at your specific situation.
The concluding discussion will solidify what we have revealed to you up to this point.
“Knowledge is limited, imagination isn’t.” Albert Einstein said that even though the wording of the next part could have been different. Einstein like any other human being wasn’t infallible. A number of his views he held right until the ending turned out to be wrong in the subject of physics. In this particular announcement he also seems to have it backwards. Knowledge might be restricted in the case of an individual but in general it is infinite even when we believe just rational understanding leaving apart transcendental. Science in particular has shown this at every step in the course of its own development. Imagination pertains to an individual thoughts and can be constrained by several things depending on the situation of the person. A mind can imagine only what relates in some way to matters already stored in it. Someone who has been outdoors a remote location in jungle and has had no contact with the world outside cannot envision what metropolitan cities would be like.
Getting back to fiction the imagination of the writer also must be predicated on his direct or indirect experiences. In this sense fiction relies on fact and to this extent it represents just another dimension of truth. Here of course we run to the philosophical problem of the precise meaning of reality. You will find two diametrically opposite views – materialistic and spiritualistic. According to the prior only things that can be perceived through our perceptions are real, everything else is unreal. The latter maintains that there is one ultimate fact from which we perceive comes out and what that is perceived is simply an illusion. We again look at a statement by Einstein: “Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a persistent one.” He was obviously referring to the fact of the phenomenal world. The word illusion can have different connotations but in general it means perceiving something rather different from what it really is. So the presence of this thing is a prerequisite for illusion, it is not a mental construction. Imagination is a mental phenomenon and has nothing to do with whatever actually existing. Thus the connection between fiction and reality is completely different from that between illusion and reality. It does take some time to write a complete story for any kind of book.
In a philosophical sense that the phenomenal world itself may be regarded as fiction. This is exactly what Shakespeare perhaps meant when he wrote: “All the world’s a stage, and all men and women merely players”. We may as well consider everything in the world (space, time, issue) as players because everything has its entrance and exit. We naturally run into the issue of saying what the point is and who wrote the script. Shakespeare most likely believed in God, strict determinism, also at the reality of the world, so he did not have this problem. Now it is usually thought that the world also includes a beginning and will have an ending. If the universe is also a participant, are there multiple universes or does it come exclusively on the stage then introduces other players? But what is the point in this case? Quantum physics points to a single possibility. At extremely small scales of space and time there is a quantum void that is not really empty but filled with energy that is constantly changing itself into virtual particles as well as back. What remains after the end of the universe could possibly be an infinite version of the quantum emptiness full of energy into which all the thing has transformed itself. This universal energy is the origin of and background for all.
It is not merely a philosophical point. We invest a substantial part of our life from the imagined or fictional universe. We muse about the things in long run and also live over the prior imagining what might have been. The creativity about the future is dependent on our hopes and ambitions and to some extent it’s a positive in the sense we are in a position to mold our future if we sincerely attempt. But musing within the past is really a futile exercise since we all know for a fact that ‘what could have been’ is mere fantasy that never happened. Still it serves the exact same purpose as fiction in the point of view of amusement. We amuse ourselves by imagining how life could have been, knowing fully well that it has no reality whatsoever. In a metaphorical sense past, at the remote past, is fiction. At a particular sense history itself is fiction since it invariably includes the abstract bias of the author. What we understand of Buddha and Jesus today is more fiction than facts.